Re: ASE catalog version for RS
Yes, you can continue to use RS 15.7.1 (and ASE 15.7 for the RSSD) for replicating between ASE 16 databases. If you're using a (relatively) old version of RS 15.7.1 then the ASE 16 repagents should...
View ArticleRe: ASE catalog version for RS
Not clear when you say load system database into ASE 16. If it is a new host + new instance then you will need to create the new RSSD (at least a shell for the load) with matching device sizes. If it...
View ArticleRe: ASE catalog version for RS
Mark & Avinash , Thank you very much.For now we'll keep using ASE 15.7 and RS 15.7.1 SP203 and then I'll suggest an in place upgrade if needed. PS : by system db's I meant ( master, model,etc)...
View ArticleRe: ASE catalog version for RS
Jose You do not need to load system databases in either case (new or in place upgrade) ! New : will have new master and model automatically created when you create the new instanceOld : there is no...
View ArticleRe: ASE catalog version for RS
Thanks Avinash,I'm clear about "in place upgrade" no loads db's are needed(just backups in case something goes wrong) RegardsJose
View ArticleSAP SRS/SLT for data lake
Hello Members, What is best tools and approach available to pull data from ECC and placing it in data lake? Regards,Amit Lal
View ArticleRe: replication server create route
So you tried to create a route and it gave the error that the destination server was unknown,then you inserted a row in rs_sites,and then you got the error rs_routeversions is corrupt ? I've done quite...
View ArticleRe: replication server create route
Creating a route requires materializing about a dozen subscriptions at the destination RSSD (so that select contents of rs_* tables are replicated from the source RSSD to the destination RSSD)....
View ArticleRe: replication server create route
Well said Mark and Luc Bottom line is that we can tweak the underlying system tables/catalog with extreme caution and only when we know what are doing and its implications. Avinash
View ArticleDatabase replication definition information
Is there a better way to get information about a database replication definition than using rs_helpdbrep? That procedure is giving erroneous information regarding DDL replication. It shows the value...
View ArticleRe: Database replication definition information
Has your primary database (and repagent) been configured to send DDL? To troubleshoot your issue we'll need a bit more info, starting with the complete output from the following stored proc...
View ArticleRe: Database replication definition information
Replication is ASE 15.5 to ASE 15.5. In our case, we do NOT want DDL replicated as is happening. However, don't understand why rs_helpdbrep indicates that it is!? Was hoping someone had a query of...
View ArticleRe: Database replication definition information
OK, so a) you don't want to replicate DDL, b) the system is *NOT* replicating DDL (as desired), but c) rs_helpdbrep is showing that DDL replication is enabled (Rep.DDL = Yes). Is this correct?...
View ArticleRe: Database replication definition information
That is correct. Yeah, already looked at code from rs_helpdbrep. And, you may be right that the definition may have been altered. Unfortunately, we do not have the original text of the 'create...
View ArticleRe: Database replication definition information
Correct ... altering the dbrepdef to not replicate DDL should cause rs_helpdbrep to show Rep.DDL = No. If you're not sure about this step ... - create a new dummy dbrepdef with 'replicate DDL' - run...
View ArticleRe: Database replication definition information
Did that and you are correct. It now shows 'No' for DDL rep. Thanks again for the help.
View Article